Let's think
this one through. You burn something, you get waste products. No way around this. Have they thought this through in California? Just how much more can we reduce pollution from gasoline engines? Probably not much without making vehicles out of paper and cellophane. Also, this gets me:
""The automakers have been crying wolf for many years now. Seatbelts, airbags, catalytic converters, I mean every single time there's been a major single advance in the technology they scream and yell. They testify before Congress that we're gonna go bankrupt if you do this to us. It couldn't be more false," said Russell Long, executive director of the Bluewater Group, a national environmental organization based in San Francisco."
It is true, and just smoke and mirrors from the environmental lobby. Since leaded gas was legislated out of existence and catalytic converters added, practically all the automakers in the US went out of business and were bought out, so now we are left with three: Ford, GM, and Chrysler. Of which Chrysler is now owned by a German corporation. Bye bye to: Lincoln, Mercury, Dodge, Jeep, AMC, Pontiac, Chevrolet, Oldsmobile, Buick, ..., what have I forgotten? Now all of these are names owned by the big three automakers. Little guys edged out by the high prices of the environmental lobby because they weren't able to compete on that level. And there has been little scientific research, let alone any evidence, that anything the mass hysteria lobby, ... er, environmental lobby is divining was, is, or will be happening.
Gee, fellas, what does examining sheep entrails tell you today?